Market Update 8-31-2009 Summer Almost over and so Might be the Rally?

It has been a month since I last updated and expected a 10%+ rally in the markets to the retrace zone. So far that has played out quite nicely. The corrective moves I expected in between haven't been the cleanest, but overall the continuation of the summer rally has not disappointed and has satisfied my expectations. Compare the attached chart to the one from last month.

Right now, though, there are reasons to be cautious. It looks like the market may be playing out a 4th wave triangle the last few days which would be a warning sign that the top could be coming soon.

There are also other reasons to be cautious such as the negative divergence showing between a few key indicators and price (see chart). Also, bullishness is at a peak as the Bullish %s are higher than they have been since 2006 and anytime since the rally began. Another item I continue to watch is the weak volume. It is expected over the summer and in particular August, but it has to raise a caution flag as the rally continues on less and less volume.

I have also attached a longer term chart of the markets below. Notice how miniscule the rally of 40-50% looks compared to where we were in 2007 as well as 2000. This rally is following very closely to what occurred in 1931 after the crash but before another huge brutal move down to the ultimate 1933 bottom which is another reason to be cautious.

Summary: I will be looking to get short before I get long, but will wait for more confirmation before I make that trade. Now is a good time to take any profits on longs as the risk reward is now high for those positions.

GMR June 2009 Quarterly Update - Warning Signs?

Blog links to transcript of earnings call...

GMR reported earnings July 30 for the quarter ended June 2009. Overall it was a little surprising...not necesarilly negative (yet), just a little surprising and cause for caution.

The one thing I had been banking on for at least another half year has ceased...GMR will drop its dividend policy significantly down to $0.50/year from $0.50/quarter. Or, from a 20%+ Yield down to a 6% or so yield. The CEO gave multiple reasons including 1) using that cash for other opportunities (acquisitions), 2) the market being terrible (spot rate market), 3) the yield being too high ("paying $2.00 divy on $8.00 share price is stupid" was his quote).

Here are my thoughts on this...

When I saw the earnings report the night before and read that they were dropping the dividend I expected a big sell off in the stock. After hours the stock peaked down 10%, but at the end of the next day (July 30) finished down around 7%, which honestly is not that bad considering its volatility. Also, the sell off was pretty much all after hours, not much happened during the day or while the conf. call was going on as far as price goes. More so, over the weekend and by the end of the day Monday, the 1st, the stock gained all of it back. It seems as though people updated their cash flow models and realized the fundamentals are still coming out positive and the only thing that has really changed is the dividend policy...which is all pretty much true.

That is exactly what should happen when you change just your payout ratio. In fact, many models will give credit for plowing back that cash into the business versus paying out (depending on discount rate used).

At the end of the day and if you read my investment philosophy, price speaks loudest and price has not said anything negative about their plowback decision, so the street obviously is not that upset about it and/or already had the news in their models.

But, here is the meat of my thoughts...

GMR has a history of buying back shares and doing acquisitions. The CEO also said it is "stupid" to pay a $2 divy on an $8 stock...which is debatable. BUT, just 3 to 6 months ago, the market, stock price, and divy policy were all the same and they chose to pay out cash in dividends versus keep the cash. So, why the change of heart so soon, when nothing has really changed at all since 6 months ago. My thoughts are they are going to try a different route with the cash such as buying back shares and/or they already are working on some target acquistions and would much rather use cash than equity to pay for it (especially with the stock price this low). It was comforting to hear the CEO say equity is the most expensive way to pay on the call. If one of these 2 routes is taken, I will be fine with it.

Buying back shares for a lot of people is the smarter thing to do because of the double taxation on dividends...again debatable (primarily true, but there is value in getting income streams versus relying on the markets for price). So, hopefully they will start buying back shares again. I will be able to tell thru the quarterly filings.

If next quarter they are not buying back shares and not hoarding cash and only paying down their cheap 5% debt, then I will have a red flag on my plate. It would tell me that they are more worried about their debt load than other uses for their cash...especially at their such low interest costs.

SUMMARY: I continue to hold, hoping that they will be buying back shares which should thoeretically lift the share price, but I am now cautious because of the surprise change of heart with seemingly little change in any of the 3 factors named by the CEO. Quick math: currently with 54MM shares, each $54MM of EBITDA should be worth $1 in share price...we shall see by October.

Let me know if any questions.