Gold is bearish in the news, but bullish in the charts?

People in the mainstream media have started to become bearish of gold.  Perhaps it is because of the almost 1 year downtrend in its price?  Media is notorious for noticing trends nearer their turning points than nearer their onset.  I believe Gold may be a current example of this and actually be setting up a bullish signal versus a bearish one.

The chart below shows the price of gold over the last two years, including the seeming bull flag/triangle that is currently in formation.

Gold chart link

I see major support in the $1530 area, which once again today held.  This support zone allows a potentially good trading opportunity in gold.  With support just 2% below, a low risk higher reward buy opportunity may be presenting itself.  A purchase of gold here with a stop at $1520 (aggressive traders) or at $1470 (longer term traders) could be a good play as I am seeing bullish signs in the chart (in addition to the contrarian buy signal set by the media).

Besides the positive longer term divergence and solid support, a bullish flag/triangle looks to be forming with the red and black trendlines helping show points of recognition.  A break above the red downsloping line and then the black resistance line (notice the parallelism with the other black support line) would help solidify the bullish case.  A move beyond the recent high ($1900) would be a likely a target of such a breakout.

If all of this comes to fruition then it likely would mean a rally in equities as well, given the high correlations between gold and the equity markets.

Good Luck!

MTA webcast series summary: Intermarket Relationships

Below is an email summary I prepared of the latest MTA webcast presentation by John Murphy from October 19 2011.
__________________________________________________________________

Hey all. Today I attended a webcast presentation by John Murphy (of stockcharts.com & MTA). John has been around a long time and is famous for his intermarket relationships analysis (one of which is required reading for the CMT). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Murphy_(economist)

If you are at all interested in the macro environment or economics and how it ties to the stock market, then his intermarkets book, may be for you. It is great at tying together the financial markets, business cycle, and technical analysis all together.
http://www.amazon.com/Intermarket-Analysis-Profiting-Relationships-Trading/dp/0471023299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1319048257&sr=8-1

I have attached the slides, which are pretty self explanatory and an easy flip through to see what's going on with a lot of different markets (contact me to obtain). You likely have already recognized some of them, but it helps to put correlations in easy to read charts. Below is a short summary of the slides in pretty much order with the presentation...

Intro: "You have to go back to the 30's to find similar correlations as today". Most "traditional" relationships have broken down in the last decade (starting with the Asian Crisis). The reason behind this is the deflationary theme we are currently in compared to the primarily inflationary period of the past. He cites 3 major deflationary events recently, the Japanese bubble bursting (1989), the asian contagion, and the US property bubble burst.

Slides 4&5: There was a paradigm shift around the time of the Asian Crisis. Bond yields and stocks started to move together. He cites a deflationary environment as the primary reason. He doesn't expect this relationship to revert back to the "norm" until deflation is out of the picture. Slide 5 shows that same relationship in 2011. In august 2011, bond yields didn't confirm the rally, which gave a hint stocks would see new lows.

Slides 6&7: Stocks and Commodities are positively correlated (extremely). This has not occurred since the 1930s. There is no other real good example in history and is one of the reasons he sees us in a deflationary environment. Commodities, like yields, seem to be leading stocks. He comments simply that Bernanke wouldn't talk about it so much if it wasn't a concern and prevalent.
One of the most reliable inverse relationships is the dollar/commodities; Recently a similar relationship has occurred between the dollar and stocks.

Slides 11&12; Stocks peak when energy outperforms...This occurred through the summer 2011. Rotation into safety, also has occurred...too early to tell if rotation into safety is over and downturn is "complete", but that cycle is longer term. Stocks are in red on slide 11 and the business cycle is in green.

Slides 14+; US stocks outperform foreign stocks when the dollar rises; however, they both fall. The Euro is something like 56% of the US Dollar Index and the majority of the 5 components.

Euro stocks are leading the US stocks right now

Ratio charts are a great way to see what is really happening and driving prices (I agree).

Q&A session...
-A China revaluation would result in inflation in America & decline of the dollar

-Use the 10 year bond when comparing across countries because most others don't have 30 year bonds.

-Expects "deflationary environment to continue until proven otherwise". Will look at bond/stock relationship to help tell.

Take care everyone and good luck! Let me know if you have any questions.
Chad

The S&P Currency Ratio Charts

After my posting yesterday I was thinking again about how much currency affects stock prices (answer: a great deal much!). To prove the effect, I came up with the attached chart which measures the performance since the October 2007 top of the S&P500 as well as its performance based in other marketable goods other than the US Dollar. The way to think about the chart is the conventional S&P 500 measurement is 1 S&P500 priced in $1 US Dollar or $SPX/$1. But, you can swap out the denominator in the equation to compare the $SPX in other liquid assets such as 1 canadian dollar, or one euro, or one barrel of oil, etc.

The reason this is relevant is because the markets are global. People from all over the world invest in the United States and vice versa. As such, people like me in the United States are affected by currency fluctuations. As a net importer most of the products purchased are from other countries (oil, electronics, many others). The exchange rate affects us more than we likely even know as a result. A truly localized economy wouldn't be affected by such things and would have a rather constant exchange rate, but that just isn't the world we live in.

In the attached chart I show the S&P500 in solid blue which is the S&P chart most people are familiar with. However, all the other line charts are also the S&P500! But, how can that be?!?!?!



The difference between the blue line and the 5 others is the blue line is the S&P500 as measured in US Dollars, the typical view found everywhere. The dashed lines are the S&P500 measured in other currencies (Red=Euro, Pink=Yen, Purple=Canada), an atypical view rarely if ever viewed or talked about. The thin black line is the market priced in a barrel of Oil and the Gold line is the market priced in an ounce of Gold. As you can see there are some major differences in price when the measurement tool is swapped out.

From a currency standpoint, the market priced in Yen (purple dashed) is only up about 20% since the March 2009 $730 equivalent level. Compare this to the S&P in dollars (blue line) which is up over 50% since then and sits at over $1200. The S&P/1 Canadian Dollar is fairing a little better, but still below the US Dollar priced S&P. The Euro is most similar to the USD based S&P, just slightly below, which means the Euro since then has behaved similarly to the US Dollar.

The S&P priced in oil is the outlyer of the group with wild swings. From the October 2007 high, the S&P priced in Oil is also lower at around $1075 from $1350...so still down around 20% which is similar to the S&P priced in dollars.

The final line in gold is the S&P priced in gold. This is currently making a new low below that of March 2009. Another way to think about it is this is how much 1 S&P500 is worth per 1 ounce of gold. This is very telling and means that Gold has significantly outperformed the US Market since the 2007 high and that priced in gold equivalent the S&P 500 is actually lower than it was in 2009. The next chart (below) is even more telling and shows that ratio since the year 2000 top.

There are many inferences one can draw from these graphs, but the primary theme is that a major reason the stock market is even as high as it is, is because of the weakening US Dollar and as a result a significant decline in the purchasing power of the American consumer. So, the stock market is up, but the American consumer's purchasing power has fallen, thus leaving them with less money at the end of the day. Just because the S&P is at a certain level, that same level doesn't buy you near what it used to and doesn't mean things are "better".

Another way to look at this is from a constant dollar perspective. The market's are quoted at current currency rates, but an investor who invests in the year 2000 invests in year 2000 dollars and is then at the mercy of both the numerator (stock performance) and the denominator (currency) over time. Therefore performance could and should be measured on a constant dollar basis (also known as purchasing power).

On that same chart from 2000 (below) that shows the S&P500 priced in gold, I also track the USD's trade weighted performance.

In March 2000 the trade weighted dollar index was around 106. Today it is around 74. Suppose that someone bought at the top in March 2000 when the S&P was at $1500 and the dollar was at 106. Now suppose that person sold today at S&P $1200. That would be a loss of $300 or 20% on the S&P...not that horrible on the surface. So that person cashes out and now wants to buy something with his $1200 cash, but he finds that his $1200 is not near what it was in 2000. In fact, on an average basis it now buys 30% less (106-74=32/106=30%) than it did in the year 2000. So in reality that investor has likely actually lost around 50% in their purchasing power over the 11 year period. They would have been much better off buying something that held its value better, however, they lost on both fronts.

This is best shown on that same chart with the S&P priced in Gold. That ratio has fallen a staggering 87% from a ratio of 5.3 S&P's per 1 oz Gold in March 2000 to only .66 S&P's for 1 ounce of gold today. Assuming Gold is a good measurement of purchasing power (which I do not totally agree with, but I think directionally it provides a good starting point), this shows that investing in the stock market since 2000 has actually set you back SIGNIFICANTLY...a lot more than the surface 20% decline implies!

Gold versus Silver? Which one?

Gold and Silver are all the rage right now!!! Sell your gold and silver advertisements are in every mall, infomercial, and financial website!

Regardless of my position on gold and silver, an investor still should choose wisely between them. Looking at the chart above, you can see why. Currently Gold is significantly underperforming silver. In fact it hasn't been this undervalued to silver since the early 80s. This can mean a lot of things (for instance what occurred in the early 80s? - hint, they both started to free fall).

However, if you must own one of them right now. Gold looks to be the far better choice. Eventually this ratio will find parity which could mean it rallies back up to at least the midpoint on the chart of around 50x. This means gold should be 50x the price of silver, or silver should be 1/50 the price of Gold. With a current gold price of $1450 silver, based on these historical standards should be around $29.

Either way, a move up or down in the metals, Gold seems to be the better choice right now.

Good Luck

Why the Dollar Matters Most

In the attached chart you will see how the dollar and the stock market are tied at the hip. Except for the late 90's (an anomaly in so many ways), the dollar and the stock market lead each other inversely.

Even more than the stock market, the dollar is tied to the debt market (which also leads stocks). The reason is interest rate parity, or lack thereof.

When a country has a high interest rate, other people in countries with lesser rates will park money in the higher rate country. This raises the price of that currency (demand up) and thus lowers the rate of their home currency (demand down). When the lesser rate country returns the money back home, its fx rate is now weaker and it wins on both accounts (higher int. rate and gain in currency). If you are familiar with the carry trade that was so popular in the 2000s, then that is similar. This market "arbitrage" also goes against the interest rate parity theory that states that countries with higher interest rates must have lower future currency rates to offset that gain.

People flock to currencies with high interest rates and that is why the dollar hit its peak in the early 80s (as interest rates peaked) and is now at an all time low (as interest rates are at an all time low). During the early 80's stocks rallied hard (the 80's bull was actually bigger than the 90's as the dollar fell 30-40%). The chart above explains why, and I will explain in an example as well.

Most items are sold "in US Dollar terms". This means that the price (denominator) is the dollar. The toy you buy your kid for xmas can be translated as toys per dollars to come up with what it will cost you to purchase it. If you could trade a blanket for that toy it would be denominated as toys per blankets to come up with its value. The same is true for the stock market.

If the stock market's earnings in 1985 were $10/year and people were willing to pay 10x for those earnings then it is priced at $100s per 1 S&P500. This can be translated as $100/1 USD (with the "1" meaning 1 US Dollar which happens to be trading at an all time high of $1.65). Assuming earnings and multiples stay the same, if the $USD then weakens to $1.00 (which it did), then the real value of your stocks just jumped 39% (translating $1.65 down to $1.00), and in order to remain whole and offset that change, the S&P500 would go to $139, just by updating the reporting unit!

An easier way to think about this is thru inflation. When the value of the dollar falls, one way to conceptualize this is to think about there being more of them out there representing the same one thing, aka now worth less per dollar. This is basically inflation. If the denominator falls, the numerator is now instantly worth more (going from 10 toys/2 blankets=5 unit cost down to 10 toys for 1 blanket=10 unit cost).

The practical way to think about this is to replace the $USD with something more tangible like milk, or a house, or a gold bar! Why measure wealth in the $USD anyways? The $USD is only as good as its purchasing power, so why not replace it with something of more consistent purchasing power? If you replace the denominator with the more tangible asset like the price of gold (which many people do), you will see that stocks have actually lost a ton of "real" value since the 2000 top. At that top stocks were worth about 5.6x an ounce of gold. Today they are worth less than 1 ounce. Chart attached below. So basically you used to be able to sell your stocks for 5.6 ounces of gold but now it will only buy less than 1 ounce of gold. Assuming an ounce of gold today has the same utility as an ounce of gold in 2000, stocks have fallen in value significantly. You can do the same with oil, commodities, water, shelter, or any other valuable, measurable necessity. Most of them will show a decline in the value of stocks over the last decade. Chart of the S&P priced in Gold, below.



The key takeaway is that stock prices are only one component of their worth (numerator). Don't forget the denominator piece (the US Dollar) as that is just as important in establishing a stock's true value. Thus, if you can get a sense of where the dollar is heading then you are 50% of the way to finding out what your stock's true value is. Another takeaway is that as long as the dollar is falling, then items priced in dollars should be going up in price, stocks included...and viceversa.

Supple this to my previous blog post on the bottoming US Dollar and we might be in for a beating in the stock market depending on the size of the move. There haven't been that many periods since the early 80s where the dollar has risen in value (except the bubble 90's where everything went up - stocks, bonds, dollar), but there are many when the dollar has fallen hard...and most of those times saw stocks rally. We got a glimpse of what a dollar rally can do to stocks in the early 2000s as well as 2008. We also know that the dollar rallied with interest rates in the 70's and early 80's when stocks were flat to down. In 2005 the dollar rallied and stocks stayed relatively flat (compared to surrounding years when the dollar fell hard and stocks rallied hard). The math also works to support this thesis. Right now (previous blog post), the dollar is looking ripe for a rally. It will be interesting to see what effect that has on stocks.

Pay close attention to that dollar!

Market Correlations - An essay on Oil Prices

In my Investment Philosophy (right side of the blog) I lay out a few examples of why markets are never fairly valued. In this blog post I will show another blatant example of this and explain what is the driving factor behind the rising price of oil.

In the chart below I have laid out the price of Oil ($WTIC) in black, the price of Gold ($GOLD) in gold color, and the price of the inverted US Dollar ($USD) in Red. The chart is over the last 3 month basis with daily closing prices. The first thing you should notice and the main point of this post is that since about April 20th these 3 markets have been eerily tied at the hip. As the US Dollar has fallen (inverted on the chart to show more clearly), the price of Gold and Oil have gone up.

As you can see oil, gold, and the decline in the dollar are all related somehow. The common denominator in the group is the $USD (since oil and gold are priced in US Dollars). Therefore, the move higher in both oil and gold prices is directly and this chart shows almost 100% related to the decline in the US Dollar's value. If you would have bought gold or oil in the past 2 months on supply and demand projections, peak oil concerns, China, or any other so called fundamental reason, you would have been wrong. The only fundamental reason to have bought those two assets is a play on the decline in the US Dollar; Any other reason and your gains are based less on a correct forecast, and more out of luck. This chart shows, at least lately, that if you want to know where the price of Gold and Oil will be, don't look to the fundamentals of those markets, look the the US Dollar market.