MTA webcast series summary: Intermarket Relationships

Below is an email summary I prepared of the latest MTA webcast presentation by John Murphy from October 19 2011.
__________________________________________________________________

Hey all. Today I attended a webcast presentation by John Murphy (of stockcharts.com & MTA). John has been around a long time and is famous for his intermarket relationships analysis (one of which is required reading for the CMT). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Murphy_(economist)

If you are at all interested in the macro environment or economics and how it ties to the stock market, then his intermarkets book, may be for you. It is great at tying together the financial markets, business cycle, and technical analysis all together.
http://www.amazon.com/Intermarket-Analysis-Profiting-Relationships-Trading/dp/0471023299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1319048257&sr=8-1

I have attached the slides, which are pretty self explanatory and an easy flip through to see what's going on with a lot of different markets (contact me to obtain). You likely have already recognized some of them, but it helps to put correlations in easy to read charts. Below is a short summary of the slides in pretty much order with the presentation...

Intro: "You have to go back to the 30's to find similar correlations as today". Most "traditional" relationships have broken down in the last decade (starting with the Asian Crisis). The reason behind this is the deflationary theme we are currently in compared to the primarily inflationary period of the past. He cites 3 major deflationary events recently, the Japanese bubble bursting (1989), the asian contagion, and the US property bubble burst.

Slides 4&5: There was a paradigm shift around the time of the Asian Crisis. Bond yields and stocks started to move together. He cites a deflationary environment as the primary reason. He doesn't expect this relationship to revert back to the "norm" until deflation is out of the picture. Slide 5 shows that same relationship in 2011. In august 2011, bond yields didn't confirm the rally, which gave a hint stocks would see new lows.

Slides 6&7: Stocks and Commodities are positively correlated (extremely). This has not occurred since the 1930s. There is no other real good example in history and is one of the reasons he sees us in a deflationary environment. Commodities, like yields, seem to be leading stocks. He comments simply that Bernanke wouldn't talk about it so much if it wasn't a concern and prevalent.
One of the most reliable inverse relationships is the dollar/commodities; Recently a similar relationship has occurred between the dollar and stocks.

Slides 11&12; Stocks peak when energy outperforms...This occurred through the summer 2011. Rotation into safety, also has occurred...too early to tell if rotation into safety is over and downturn is "complete", but that cycle is longer term. Stocks are in red on slide 11 and the business cycle is in green.

Slides 14+; US stocks outperform foreign stocks when the dollar rises; however, they both fall. The Euro is something like 56% of the US Dollar Index and the majority of the 5 components.

Euro stocks are leading the US stocks right now

Ratio charts are a great way to see what is really happening and driving prices (I agree).

Q&A session...
-A China revaluation would result in inflation in America & decline of the dollar

-Use the 10 year bond when comparing across countries because most others don't have 30 year bonds.

-Expects "deflationary environment to continue until proven otherwise". Will look at bond/stock relationship to help tell.

Take care everyone and good luck! Let me know if you have any questions.
Chad

The S&P Currency Ratio Charts

After my posting yesterday I was thinking again about how much currency affects stock prices (answer: a great deal much!). To prove the effect, I came up with the attached chart which measures the performance since the October 2007 top of the S&P500 as well as its performance based in other marketable goods other than the US Dollar. The way to think about the chart is the conventional S&P 500 measurement is 1 S&P500 priced in $1 US Dollar or $SPX/$1. But, you can swap out the denominator in the equation to compare the $SPX in other liquid assets such as 1 canadian dollar, or one euro, or one barrel of oil, etc.

The reason this is relevant is because the markets are global. People from all over the world invest in the United States and vice versa. As such, people like me in the United States are affected by currency fluctuations. As a net importer most of the products purchased are from other countries (oil, electronics, many others). The exchange rate affects us more than we likely even know as a result. A truly localized economy wouldn't be affected by such things and would have a rather constant exchange rate, but that just isn't the world we live in.

In the attached chart I show the S&P500 in solid blue which is the S&P chart most people are familiar with. However, all the other line charts are also the S&P500! But, how can that be?!?!?!



The difference between the blue line and the 5 others is the blue line is the S&P500 as measured in US Dollars, the typical view found everywhere. The dashed lines are the S&P500 measured in other currencies (Red=Euro, Pink=Yen, Purple=Canada), an atypical view rarely if ever viewed or talked about. The thin black line is the market priced in a barrel of Oil and the Gold line is the market priced in an ounce of Gold. As you can see there are some major differences in price when the measurement tool is swapped out.

From a currency standpoint, the market priced in Yen (purple dashed) is only up about 20% since the March 2009 $730 equivalent level. Compare this to the S&P in dollars (blue line) which is up over 50% since then and sits at over $1200. The S&P/1 Canadian Dollar is fairing a little better, but still below the US Dollar priced S&P. The Euro is most similar to the USD based S&P, just slightly below, which means the Euro since then has behaved similarly to the US Dollar.

The S&P priced in oil is the outlyer of the group with wild swings. From the October 2007 high, the S&P priced in Oil is also lower at around $1075 from $1350...so still down around 20% which is similar to the S&P priced in dollars.

The final line in gold is the S&P priced in gold. This is currently making a new low below that of March 2009. Another way to think about it is this is how much 1 S&P500 is worth per 1 ounce of gold. This is very telling and means that Gold has significantly outperformed the US Market since the 2007 high and that priced in gold equivalent the S&P 500 is actually lower than it was in 2009. The next chart (below) is even more telling and shows that ratio since the year 2000 top.

There are many inferences one can draw from these graphs, but the primary theme is that a major reason the stock market is even as high as it is, is because of the weakening US Dollar and as a result a significant decline in the purchasing power of the American consumer. So, the stock market is up, but the American consumer's purchasing power has fallen, thus leaving them with less money at the end of the day. Just because the S&P is at a certain level, that same level doesn't buy you near what it used to and doesn't mean things are "better".

Another way to look at this is from a constant dollar perspective. The market's are quoted at current currency rates, but an investor who invests in the year 2000 invests in year 2000 dollars and is then at the mercy of both the numerator (stock performance) and the denominator (currency) over time. Therefore performance could and should be measured on a constant dollar basis (also known as purchasing power).

On that same chart from 2000 (below) that shows the S&P500 priced in gold, I also track the USD's trade weighted performance.

In March 2000 the trade weighted dollar index was around 106. Today it is around 74. Suppose that someone bought at the top in March 2000 when the S&P was at $1500 and the dollar was at 106. Now suppose that person sold today at S&P $1200. That would be a loss of $300 or 20% on the S&P...not that horrible on the surface. So that person cashes out and now wants to buy something with his $1200 cash, but he finds that his $1200 is not near what it was in 2000. In fact, on an average basis it now buys 30% less (106-74=32/106=30%) than it did in the year 2000. So in reality that investor has likely actually lost around 50% in their purchasing power over the 11 year period. They would have been much better off buying something that held its value better, however, they lost on both fronts.

This is best shown on that same chart with the S&P priced in Gold. That ratio has fallen a staggering 87% from a ratio of 5.3 S&P's per 1 oz Gold in March 2000 to only .66 S&P's for 1 ounce of gold today. Assuming Gold is a good measurement of purchasing power (which I do not totally agree with, but I think directionally it provides a good starting point), this shows that investing in the stock market since 2000 has actually set you back SIGNIFICANTLY...a lot more than the surface 20% decline implies!

Current Elliott Wave Count and Japan 1989 Comparison

Well, it looks like it is finally here. The next leg of the biggest bear market in most people's lifetime may finally be upon us. However, for most investors the probabilities are not yet high enough to justify a short position...not yet, anyways...there should be plenty of opportunities.

Attached is the latest wave count I am following. Encroachment into the Flash Crash territory of 2010 killed a lot of the bulls's hope of this being a new bull market up from the March 2009 lows. However, I would like to see a monthly close below $1190 to give even more probability to this count being correct from a longer term perspective. A new low around or below $1100 is needed before I can fully get excited about the new leg down. Once that occurs we should see a big rally back to where we are around now. At that time will be a good spot to get short and close longs. The market will have revealed more cards to us by then.

From a near term perspective I equate August's action to that of January 2008. Both of these months saw "hammer" candlesticks and ended big moves down from multi-year highs in the indices which subsequently rebounded some of that move. They also both occurred 4 months after the respective recent price highs. The first and last weeks of February of 2008 were strongly down with the culmination of that move down occurring March of 2008. If things are playing out similarly, then I expect September to be pretty volatile as well.

Linkable Real Time Chart : http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$SPX&p=M&yr=5&mn=0&dy=0&id=p72172925866&a=242864511



Finally, I would like to use Japan's last 3 decades as a roadmap to our current situation (some of the reasons I lay out on the chart below). Japan is the only major example of a deflationary environment in recent history and its size, importance, etc mimic the US's situation fairly well with some supporting arguments on the chart.





The key to me in the whole deflationary scenario is the country's currency situation. Just like the United States, Japan's stock market exploded as its currency declined in the 1980's...this makes sense as I have laid out in other postings about the $USD (see list of $USD labels to the right). Also, Japan's market peaked roughly when their currency bottomed. Since then, the market has declined significantly, deflation has taken hold, and its currency recently made new highs near all time stock market lows. Boiling it down to one point, I expect the US dollar to rally for the distant future keeping a lid on stock prices, supporting the deflation and low interest rates argument, and behaving similarly as Japan did the last few decades.

Keep in mind, one days volume on the foreign exchange markets is around $4 trillion...it absolutely trumps the stock market.

A lesson in International Finance

Attached is a chart of Symrise AG, based out of Germany and traded on the German exchanges. I apologize that the chart isn't near as clean as the stockcharts.com charts I usually use, but stockcharts.com doesn't have access to the European exchanges yet (just US and Canada). However, Tradestation is great for use with foreign currencies as will be shown.

I want to talk briefly about the difference between a US traded stock and a foreign stock trading thru its ADR (American Depository Receipt) on the US markets. The ADR for all intents and purposes is the share ownership of the underlying asset. However, the key difference is that the ADR must adjust for exchange rates between the ADR and the home country's security price. The chart above will show you how big a difference it can make!

The top chart is of the Symrise ADR traded in the States. The second chart is the price of the Euro. The 3rd chart is a nice ratio chart essentially converting the ADR back into its home country's currency. The final graph is that of the 20 trading day correlation (1 month).

The one thing I don't like about the tradestation platform for charting is the text which is a pain to use, but other than that it has some wonderful functionality such as the correlation graph that I don't have at stockcharts.com.

Ignoring the text for now, the ADR looks to have completed a 5 wave move up from its June lows and topped in November. Notice similar tops occurred on the spread chart. What is nice about the June top is that occurred at a time the Euro was weakening, so the move from Nov 2009 to May 2010 was actually stronger than the ADR would leave you to believe (as the spread chart helps show).

However the main thing I wanted to point out with this ADR (and likely many others) is the recent correlation. Notice the 20 day correlation is sitting at .60 and has been steadily climbing over the past year and a half. This means that more and more of the ADR's return is actually coming from changes in the exchange rate rather than changes in the company's performance. That is important to note so that you don't confuse the reasons for the stock's returns.

This blog heading's title above links to the German traded Symrise AG on bigcharts.com. I have also copied it below. This is helpful in seeing a longer time horizon of the company since the American ADR just started in late 2008. Notice that early '09 was the longer term price bottom. It also looks like a pretty good impulsive move up. The November top does indeed look like a completed 5 wave top assuming a May/June '09 2nd wave and May/June 2010 4th wave. If so then support could be found in the $20 ADR ($16 German exchange and spread chart) assuming a breakdown below $25 on the ADR.



One final point on the spread chart. Notice its current price of 20.05Euros. Compare this to the bigcharts.com German traded price of 20.14Euros...pretty close and lets us know that we did the conversion correctly. You can also go to this site to look up the German stocks...

http://deutsche-boerse.com/dbag/dispatch/en/isg/gdb_navigation/home?module=InOverview_Equi&wp=DE000SYM9999&foldertype=_Equi

Why the Dollar Matters Most

In the attached chart you will see how the dollar and the stock market are tied at the hip. Except for the late 90's (an anomaly in so many ways), the dollar and the stock market lead each other inversely.

Even more than the stock market, the dollar is tied to the debt market (which also leads stocks). The reason is interest rate parity, or lack thereof.

When a country has a high interest rate, other people in countries with lesser rates will park money in the higher rate country. This raises the price of that currency (demand up) and thus lowers the rate of their home currency (demand down). When the lesser rate country returns the money back home, its fx rate is now weaker and it wins on both accounts (higher int. rate and gain in currency). If you are familiar with the carry trade that was so popular in the 2000s, then that is similar. This market "arbitrage" also goes against the interest rate parity theory that states that countries with higher interest rates must have lower future currency rates to offset that gain.

People flock to currencies with high interest rates and that is why the dollar hit its peak in the early 80s (as interest rates peaked) and is now at an all time low (as interest rates are at an all time low). During the early 80's stocks rallied hard (the 80's bull was actually bigger than the 90's as the dollar fell 30-40%). The chart above explains why, and I will explain in an example as well.

Most items are sold "in US Dollar terms". This means that the price (denominator) is the dollar. The toy you buy your kid for xmas can be translated as toys per dollars to come up with what it will cost you to purchase it. If you could trade a blanket for that toy it would be denominated as toys per blankets to come up with its value. The same is true for the stock market.

If the stock market's earnings in 1985 were $10/year and people were willing to pay 10x for those earnings then it is priced at $100s per 1 S&P500. This can be translated as $100/1 USD (with the "1" meaning 1 US Dollar which happens to be trading at an all time high of $1.65). Assuming earnings and multiples stay the same, if the $USD then weakens to $1.00 (which it did), then the real value of your stocks just jumped 39% (translating $1.65 down to $1.00), and in order to remain whole and offset that change, the S&P500 would go to $139, just by updating the reporting unit!

An easier way to think about this is thru inflation. When the value of the dollar falls, one way to conceptualize this is to think about there being more of them out there representing the same one thing, aka now worth less per dollar. This is basically inflation. If the denominator falls, the numerator is now instantly worth more (going from 10 toys/2 blankets=5 unit cost down to 10 toys for 1 blanket=10 unit cost).

The practical way to think about this is to replace the $USD with something more tangible like milk, or a house, or a gold bar! Why measure wealth in the $USD anyways? The $USD is only as good as its purchasing power, so why not replace it with something of more consistent purchasing power? If you replace the denominator with the more tangible asset like the price of gold (which many people do), you will see that stocks have actually lost a ton of "real" value since the 2000 top. At that top stocks were worth about 5.6x an ounce of gold. Today they are worth less than 1 ounce. Chart attached below. So basically you used to be able to sell your stocks for 5.6 ounces of gold but now it will only buy less than 1 ounce of gold. Assuming an ounce of gold today has the same utility as an ounce of gold in 2000, stocks have fallen in value significantly. You can do the same with oil, commodities, water, shelter, or any other valuable, measurable necessity. Most of them will show a decline in the value of stocks over the last decade. Chart of the S&P priced in Gold, below.



The key takeaway is that stock prices are only one component of their worth (numerator). Don't forget the denominator piece (the US Dollar) as that is just as important in establishing a stock's true value. Thus, if you can get a sense of where the dollar is heading then you are 50% of the way to finding out what your stock's true value is. Another takeaway is that as long as the dollar is falling, then items priced in dollars should be going up in price, stocks included...and viceversa.

Supple this to my previous blog post on the bottoming US Dollar and we might be in for a beating in the stock market depending on the size of the move. There haven't been that many periods since the early 80s where the dollar has risen in value (except the bubble 90's where everything went up - stocks, bonds, dollar), but there are many when the dollar has fallen hard...and most of those times saw stocks rally. We got a glimpse of what a dollar rally can do to stocks in the early 2000s as well as 2008. We also know that the dollar rallied with interest rates in the 70's and early 80's when stocks were flat to down. In 2005 the dollar rallied and stocks stayed relatively flat (compared to surrounding years when the dollar fell hard and stocks rallied hard). The math also works to support this thesis. Right now (previous blog post), the dollar is looking ripe for a rally. It will be interesting to see what effect that has on stocks.

Pay close attention to that dollar!

$USD - Very Interesting Right Now

The US Dollar right now is the center of the world! Bearishness seems to be at an ultimate extreme. Everyone keeps talking about how the dollar is doomed, how the spending in Washington is never ending, how the Fed is determined to monetize the debt (thru inflation) yet there is one glaring piece of evidence that I continue to look at and maintain contrarian and at least a little bullish...

Why is the price of the $USD not at an all time low? You would think with the demise of America as we know it that people would be dumping the dollar more than ever. But, the price today is $77.82 (up 1.61%) which is higher than last year's low after the QE1 announcement of $74 which is higher still than the 2008 low as the stock market started to tank of $71 and before all QE. That is still over 10% away from where we are now. That is a HUGE percent in the largest market in the world (currency).

From a charting perspective we are at a very interesting point. There looks to be a potential triangle forming (which would be longer term bearish) but there are issues with that triangle. There are 5 wave moves within the triangle, which is typically a no no. Plus the extreme bearishness isn't indicative of another move in the same direction. However if this is a triangle the final E move up of the A-B-C-D-E pattern should last at least a few months which will likely ease any bearishness. There also exists a potential that the move down from June is impulsive and that high was the top of a corrective flat pattern except there exists structural issues with that pattern as well (no new low at the end of 09, for one).

The other side of the coin has this baby in a potential bull move. The rising trend from the 08 low is still in tact and if nothing else we should get a bounce here (which looks to be already occurring). The final key to this would be to take out the 09 high of $90. If that happens, jump on the rally.

How we know where to place our bets...
1) If the price exceeds $90 then the triangle is invalid and the wave count I have labeled is the most likely (3rd wave beginning now).
2) If price drops below the triangle and breaks $74 then the likelihood is that the triangle (or flat correction counts) were correct and we should see new lows (potentially a huge move down if the triangle measurement is confirmed -19 points from the breakout point which will put the dollar in the 50's).
3) In the meantime, prices are rallying, this is either the E wave of the triangle, the 2 wave of the new move down (flat correction), or the mega 3rd wave of the new bull market that started in early 2008.

This chart is so important because the dollar is involved in all asset classes. Stocks, Bonds, and Commodities all have dollar denominators. So, if the dollar rallies, expect stocks and commodities to fall (especially commodities) ceterus paribus. The dollar is the daddy and leads all other asset tops and bottoms. It also trumps all the other markets in the world. People need to remember that the dollar is 100% RELATIVE in a fiat currency world. It will go up in price if it is better than the alternative (Europe, England, Japan, other major nations). So it can be easy to justify a dollar rally, especially if Europe continues to have problems and Japan decides the Yen is way too strong (which Im sure they already are saying).

Good Luck. This chart is very important and will be very telling.

Market Correlations - An essay on Oil Prices

In my Investment Philosophy (right side of the blog) I lay out a few examples of why markets are never fairly valued. In this blog post I will show another blatant example of this and explain what is the driving factor behind the rising price of oil.

In the chart below I have laid out the price of Oil ($WTIC) in black, the price of Gold ($GOLD) in gold color, and the price of the inverted US Dollar ($USD) in Red. The chart is over the last 3 month basis with daily closing prices. The first thing you should notice and the main point of this post is that since about April 20th these 3 markets have been eerily tied at the hip. As the US Dollar has fallen (inverted on the chart to show more clearly), the price of Gold and Oil have gone up.

As you can see oil, gold, and the decline in the dollar are all related somehow. The common denominator in the group is the $USD (since oil and gold are priced in US Dollars). Therefore, the move higher in both oil and gold prices is directly and this chart shows almost 100% related to the decline in the US Dollar's value. If you would have bought gold or oil in the past 2 months on supply and demand projections, peak oil concerns, China, or any other so called fundamental reason, you would have been wrong. The only fundamental reason to have bought those two assets is a play on the decline in the US Dollar; Any other reason and your gains are based less on a correct forecast, and more out of luck. This chart shows, at least lately, that if you want to know where the price of Gold and Oil will be, don't look to the fundamentals of those markets, look the the US Dollar market.

$USD Update Email 1-23-09

To: Friends
Subject: Good technical chart of the $USD

Looks like a resumption of the dollar downtrend with a sweet retest of support now acting as resistance. This chart is technical analysis 101. Basically it implies that those who bought above support are all now losers and will sell at any hint of getting back close to even. That is why support becomes resistance because everyone that bought above that line is now losing money (Since November) and will take any chance to break even.

I will be watching Gold and the gld to confirm a renewed downtrend in the USD. If the dollar can get back above support then the bulls will win out. That is where you put your stop...around $86 on the USD.